What Happens Next?

- jim Young

“There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice… but there must never be a time when we fail to protest.” - Elie Wiesel


Whichever side of the fence you’re on in the Freedom Convoy Protest of 2022, the fact remains that the Federal Court of Canada has ruled that Trudeau and his Government violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms when they invoked the Emergencies Act on February 14, 2022 in Ottawa.



Passed into law in 1988 the Emergencies Act” had never previously been used under that name. The Emergencies Act replaced the War Measures Act which had been adopted in 1914 shortly after the beginning of World War I.


The War Measures Act had been invoked only 3 times. Once during World War I, once during World War II and lastly on October 17th, 1970 when Justin Trudeau’s father Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau invoked it, suspending civil liberties during the FLQ crisis. This is the only time the War Measures Act had been put in place in peacetime.


Similar to the War Measures Act, the intent of the Emergencies Act is to enable the government to take extraordinary but temporary measures when needed to protect the public in emergency situations. Apparently, according to the most recent ruling, it wasn’t needed against the Freedom Convoy Protest.


To qualify as a “public emergency” there must be a threat to the security of Canada as outlined by CSIS.


2(c): “activities within or relating to Canada directed toward or in support of the

threat or use of acts of serious violence against persons or property for the

purpose of achieving a political, religious or ideological objective within Canada

or a foreign state.” The threat cannot be “lawful advocacy, protest or dissent,”

unless it is carried out in conjunction with one of the four “threats to the security

of Canada,” defined in s. 2.


Making the claim that invoking the Emergencies Act was unconstitutional by that definition, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA), the Canadian Constitution Foundation (CCF) and others took the matter to court last year.


In the end, Justice Richard G. Mosley recently ruled that invoking the Emergencies Act was unreasonable, unjustified, unintelligent and lacked transparency.


So what happens next? Well of course Trudeau will file an appeal with the Supreme Court of Canada to try to get this ruling overturned, but barring the success of that… what’s really next? 


Ultimately the most important outcome of this will be to ensure it doesn’t happen again. Once bitten, twice shy as the old saying goes. The rights of Canadians to hold a peaceful protest need to be ensured.


Beyond that however, what’s in store for all those involved?


According to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms under the heading Chartapedia, 


Section 24(1) – Remedies

Provision

24.(1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have

been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain

such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances.


If I am interpreting this correctly, anyone involved in the protests whose rights were infringed upon should be entitled to apply to receive a “remedy” as in “having the situation rectified”.


But what does that really mean? It could be argued the situation was “rectified” just 9 days later when the Emergencies Act was revoked after having been put in place.


But that would be like saying the assault was rectified when the assailant quit beating you. 


I would hope in this case it would mean all charges dropped, all fines reversed, all items previously confiscated returned… that kind of thing. I would hope it would even cover court costs for the plaintiffs, but there’s no direct mention of any of that.


Will the protesters be compensated for wrongful incarceration? Lost wages from being prevented from working?


General (Non-Pecuniary) Damages, Pecuniary Damages, Nominal Damages, Compensatory (or Actual) Damages, Punitive (or Exemplary) Damages, Aggravated Damages, Liquidated Damages are all types of damages typically awarded in most kinds of litigation.


Who will be responsible for the payout? You can bet it won’t be Trudeau or even any of the members of the government that were all part of the scheme. It will be you and I - the taxpayers.


And what about punitive damages? Trudeau and his cronies broke the law when they invoked the Emergencies Act. We’re not talking about speeding ticket laws here. This was a biggie. It was a very important, fundamental law that they broke - the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. What’s the penalty for that? Dismissal from their positions? I would think something like this should be a criminal offense. Does it involve jail time? Or just a fine? And if we’re back to a fine… you know who’s paying.


- 30 -


https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art241.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Stuff others read

Obituary: 173 Big Bay Point Road

Image
- jim Young “You can’t go home again.” - Thomas Wolfe. There isn’t much that is more exciting to a 7 year old boy than hanging around a construction site. Once the vivid imagination of a young boy begins to stir, the excavation for the basement will take him on a journey to China, the cement blocks of the foundation transform the hole in the ground into a formidable castle, scrap pieces of wood cut at a 45° angle become the bulky sails of a sailboat, the studded walls, as they are erected become prison bars that the young lad can escape through and rafters, when hung, will serve as monkey bars. At least that’s how it was for me. Most children are denied this experience today for the sake of safety. But in 1960 these opportunities were more readily available. And when your grandfather was building the house, even more so. That your grandfather might be building that house for you, well, that was the icing on the cake. I remember my grandfather letting me help him “build” our house. Und
More... »

Facebook Imposters - A Form Of Identity Theft

Image
- jim Young “My bank balance is a constant reminder that I am safe from identity theft.” - anon DEFINITIONS Scammer: a person who deceives another into parting with their money or confidential information for personal gain. This can be done through personal contact, by phone, through the post office, by email or on the internet. Hacker: a scammer who uses computers and technology to gain unauthorized access to data. Facebook Imposter/Clone: a scammer who clones someone else’s Facebook account with the intention of hacking or scamming. Most often their intended target is not the owner of the Facebook account that has been cloned, but rather their friends. The Facebook Imposter Up Close & Personal I would imagine that in the hierarchy of scammers, hackers and Facebook Imposters, the Facebook Imposter is the lowest on the scale. If I were a hacker I would be embarrassed that these scumbags even exist. Of course I would also be embarrassed at my own existence as a hacker but the Fac
More... »

Another Dougie Doozie

Image
- Jim Young “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.” - Grouch Marx In April 2023, in an attempt to reduce their environmental footprint, the LCBO announced they would quit issuing paper bags to their customers, later that same year. The plan was to eliminate 135 million paper bags from the LCBO per annum. Calculated to save 188,000 trees each and every year thereafter, it was also estimated that 2,665 tonnes of waste would be diverted from landfills annually. Miles ahead of most other retail operations, the LCBO had already voluntarily eliminated plastic bags 15 years prior to that, shortly after the turn of the century. Even so, the LCBO’s decision to stop providing even paper bags to their customers altogether was not a novel idea. Many other retailers have stopped offering free bags, encouraging their customers to bring their own bags or purchase reusable bags which are said to be more environmen
More... »