Facebook Faces Greed, Not Censorship

- jim Young 

"Adam was but human. This explains it all. He did not want the apple for the apple's sake, he wanted it only because it was forbidden. The mistake was in not forbidding the serpent; then he would have eaten the serpent." - Mark Twain, Pudd'nhead Wilson

A facebook friend of mine recently posed this question on Facebook.


I don't know if the notice was actually sent by Facebook or not and I'm not going to take the time to research it.

What is interesting is that it quickly evoked a couple of replies suggesting this action was a result of the Canadian Government's passing of Bill C-11.

"Censorship at work."

That wasn't my interpretation of Bill C-11 at all. From what I understand, Bill C-11 is not about censorship, but more about royalties and fair pay for fair play that will bring the internet more in line with over-the-air broadcasting regulations.

Facebook is suggesting they "can't share the news". That's not entirely true. In fact Facebook can share the news if they are willing to pay for it. In my mind, falsely crying "censorship" over this suggests to me that Facebook is not even responsible enough to enjoy the privilege of broadcasting the news. However, there are no bills or laws that can prevent their right to do  so, as long as they are willing to pay their fair share.

We are so used to the news being free, we sometimes forget that it costs a lot of money for the media to send out its reporters and photographers to gather these news stories. Some of these reporters put themselves at great risk and some even die for it. Some of those reporters work very hard and endure great sacrifices to expose the truth while others are lazy, exploitive and just trying to make a quick, easy buck.

Either way, somebody has to pay for that. And regardless of what you may think of the main-stream media, those paying for that service are entitled to a fair return on their money.

Social media platforms such as Facebook have been getting a free ride all this time and exploiting the media to line their own pockets. What's really said is their greed has grown to the point where, instead of accepting the extra they've been receiving all these years as a bonus, the social platforms are now crying foul and trying to make you believe they are the victims here by suggesting your rights are being infringed. They don't want you to notice how greedy they really are.

It's kind of line a pet owner complaining his dog is not going to starve because, after stealing dog food for years, he's been caught and is being told he now has to pay for his own dog's food.

The news is not being censored. It is freely available in a wide variety of media. If Facebook chooses not to broadcast the news on their medium, rather than pay the costs of doing so, that's their right and their choice. But it's not censorship. It's a business decision they will arrive at when weighing the costs vs the revenue they might receive by broadcasting the news.

The Great North Arrow has recently made the decision to stay away from reporting hard news stories yet no one has accused them of censoring the news. It was a business decision plain and simple.

What I find particularly amusing in all this, is most of the people I know who have criticized Bill C-11 in the first place, are also the first to criticize the media in general.

"Fake News!" is the cry of the day applied to everything and anything that someone doesn't agree with, regardless of whether or not there is any validity to the story. The media is "biased" and "too opinionated. It's corrupt and just trying to make a buck."

"You can't believe ANYTHING the main-stream media reports."

Why then, is the disappearance of news broadcasts from "social" media so unsettling? It seems to me like Facebook is playing these people on both ends.

Maybe it's time for social media like Facebook to get back to their roots and just be "social entertainment".

- 30 -


Comments

Post a Comment

Stuff others read

Obituary: 173 Big Bay Point Road

Image
- jim Young “You can’t go home again.” - Thomas Wolfe. There isn’t much that is more exciting to a 7 year old boy than hanging around a construction site. Once the vivid imagination of a young boy begins to stir, the excavation for the basement will take him on a journey to China, the cement blocks of the foundation transform the hole in the ground into a formidable castle, scrap pieces of wood cut at a 45° angle become the bulky sails of a sailboat, the studded walls, as they are erected become prison bars that the young lad can escape through and rafters, when hung, will serve as monkey bars. At least that’s how it was for me. Most children are denied this experience today for the sake of safety. But in 1960 these opportunities were more readily available. And when your grandfather was building the house, even more so. That your grandfather might be building that house for you, well, that was the icing on the cake. I remember my grandfather letting me help him “build” our house. Und
More... »

Facebook Imposters - A Form Of Identity Theft

Image
- jim Young “My bank balance is a constant reminder that I am safe from identity theft.” - anon DEFINITIONS Scammer: a person who deceives another into parting with their money or confidential information for personal gain. This can be done through personal contact, by phone, through the post office, by email or on the internet. Hacker: a scammer who uses computers and technology to gain unauthorized access to data. Facebook Imposter/Clone: a scammer who clones someone else’s Facebook account with the intention of hacking or scamming. Most often their intended target is not the owner of the Facebook account that has been cloned, but rather their friends. The Facebook Imposter Up Close & Personal I would imagine that in the hierarchy of scammers, hackers and Facebook Imposters, the Facebook Imposter is the lowest on the scale. If I were a hacker I would be embarrassed that these scumbags even exist. Of course I would also be embarrassed at my own existence as a hacker but the Fac
More... »

Another Dougie Doozie

Image
- Jim Young “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.” - Grouch Marx In April 2023, in an attempt to reduce their environmental footprint, the LCBO announced they would quit issuing paper bags to their customers, later that same year. The plan was to eliminate 135 million paper bags from the LCBO per annum. Calculated to save 188,000 trees each and every year thereafter, it was also estimated that 2,665 tonnes of waste would be diverted from landfills annually. Miles ahead of most other retail operations, the LCBO had already voluntarily eliminated plastic bags 15 years prior to that, shortly after the turn of the century. Even so, the LCBO’s decision to stop providing even paper bags to their customers altogether was not a novel idea. Many other retailers have stopped offering free bags, encouraging their customers to bring their own bags or purchase reusable bags which are said to be more environmen
More... »